Legal Opinion

Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Hardman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 20, 1933No. 6 Div. 297PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The only question argued on this appeal is whether the affirmative charge should have been given appellant because the evidence did not sustain the averment that the accident occurred at a public crossing over the railroad track known as, to wit, Twenty-fourth street in the city of Irondale, Jefferson county.

It is alleged and shown that plaintiff’s automobile, while driven by another, in attempting to cross the track of defendant near the station (about a quarter of a mile) from Iron-dale, missed the crossing, ran into a ditch on the side, but was partly across the track.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. L. & N. R. R. v. CalvertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Strickland v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Lambert v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kendrick v. BIRMINGHNA SOUTHERN R. CO.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  2. Jordan v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Lunney v. Southern Railway CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  4. Maise v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Woodward Iron Co. v. MumpowerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API