Legal Opinion

Stockton v. Morris & Pierce

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1937PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

Morris & Pierce is a partnership handling tobacco products at wholesale. Stockton and Dossett are employees in the Department of Finance and Taxation of this state, who, while engaged on February 9, 1937, in enforcing collection of revenue under chapter 58 of the Pub. Acts of 1933 and chapter 46 of the Acts of Extra Session of 1935, seized on the premises of Morris & Pierce, in Knoxville, as contraband a quantity of tobacco to which no state revenue stamps had been affixed. Thereupon this suit in replevin was brought by Morris & Pierce and, on the fiat of the circuit judge, the tobacco was…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Sterling v. ConstantinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Pennoyer v. McConnaughySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. General Oil Co. v. CrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Colonial Pipeline Co. v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Fallin v. Knox County Board of CommissionersTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Knight v. State Board of EducationDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1961
  4. Simmons v. ParizekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  5. Holdredge v. City of ClevelandTennessee Supreme Court · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API