Legal Opinion

McCaskey v. Kirchoff

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 10, 1959PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

56 N.J. Super. 178 (1959)

152 A.2d 140

JOSEPH McCASKEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

RICHARD W. KIRCHOFF, WILLIAM H. HAU AND ALEXANDER WOJCICKI, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 8, 1959.

Decided June 10, 1959.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and HANEMAN.

Mr. Theodore Sager Meth argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Meth & Wood, attorneys).

No brief was filed by respondents.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

Plaintiff appeals from a final judgment of the Superior Court, Law Division, holding valid a petition of nomination filed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sadloch v. AllanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. Weisberger v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. Collins v. HeffernanNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Hollingsworth v. Spectator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  5. Murray v. MurrayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lesniak v. BudzashSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  2. Brousseau v. FitzgeraldArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In Re Petition of SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  4. In Re ChiricoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  5. In Re Ross PetitionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API