Legal Opinion

Weisberger v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 25, 1940PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case the board of elections has found that out of the total of 1,413 names appearing upon the petition, 315 were irregular for various reasons. The court below found that there were forgeries appearing upon the sheets authenticated by the witnesses Rofrano and Williams, and by the petitioner Weisberger. Rofrano had authenticated 113 signatures, Williams 20 signatures, and Weisberger, the candidate, 123 signatures. The candidate called no witnesses and submitted no proof.

We thus have a petition in which over twenty per cent of the signatures are concededly irregular and where the…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brousseau v. FitzgeraldArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Lefkowitz v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  3. Franklin Bruce Ross v. Ken BennettArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Johnson v. WestallNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Bloom v. PowerNew York Supreme Court · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API