Legal Opinion

Molea v. Aetna Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 5, 1950PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCounihan, J.

These are eight actions of contract in which the plaintiffs seek to recover on separate policies of fire insurance in Massachusetts standard form. Seven of these policies covered personal property, and one, issued by the Granite State Fire Insurance Company of Portsmouth, New Hampshire, hereinafter called the Granite company, covered the building which contained the personal property. The actions were tried to a jury. At the close of the testimony all of the defendants filed motions for directed verdicts which were allowed by the judge. The actions are here upon the plaintiffs’ exceptions to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Union Institution for Savings v. Phoenix InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Hutchinson v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  3. Lamson Consolidated Store Service Co. v. Prudential Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  4. Commonwealth v. SansoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. F. & M. Skirt Co. v. Rhode Island InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Milton Raphelson, Appeal of Massachusetts Property Insurance Underwriting AssociationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  2. Ben Elfman & Sons, Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. F.C.I. Realty Trust v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
  4. McCord v. Horace Mann InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  5. Souza v. TorphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API