Legal Opinion

Braseth v. County of Bottineau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1904PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Bottineau county; Cowcm, J. Action by O. A. Braseth against the County of Bottineau. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Affidavit should be made by the chairman of defendant’s county commissioners, not the attorney. The only reason for the failure to answer was the negligence of such chairman in not correctly informing the state’s attorney of the correct time of service of summons. The excuse is entirely insufficient.

Read the full summary

Appeal from District Court, Bottineau county; Cowcm, J. Action by O. A. Braseth against the County of Bottineau. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Affidavit should be made by the chairman of defendant’s county commissioners, not the attorney. The only reason for the failure to answer was the negligence of such chairman in not correctly informing the state’s attorney of the correct time of service of summons. The excuse is entirely insufficient. Elliott v. Shaw, 16 Cal. 377; 6 Enc. PL & Pr. 162; Union Hide, etc., Co. v. Woodley, 75 111. 435; Shay v. Chicago Clock Co., 44 Pac. 237;…

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, C. J.

The plaintiff appeals from an order of the district court of Bottineau county vacating a judgment which he had caused to be entered in this action against the defendant upon default of answer.

Counsel for appellant contends, as grounds for reversal, that (1) the defendant has not offered a sufficient excuse for his failure to answer within the statutory period, and (2) that the motion papers are not legally sufficient. We are of opinion that neither of these objections should be sustained. The action is to recover a balance of $4,095, which the plaintiff alleges is due for labor and *347material…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hanthorn v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Garr, Scott & Co. v. SpauldingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Jensen v. BarbourMontana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Miller v. CarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Wheeler v. CastorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Suburban Sales & Service, Inc. v. District Court of Ramsey CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hall v. McConeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Racine-Sattley Manufacturing Co. v. PavlicekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Ingalls v. BakkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Walsh v. BoyleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API