Legal Opinion

Garr, Scott & Co. v. Spaulding

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1892PublishedCited by 23 opinions

A PPEAL from district court, Cass county; Hon. William /a. B. McConnell, Judge. Action by Garr, Scott & Co. against B. F. Spaulding for the possession or value of certain personal property, Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

The authorities relied upon by the counsel are set forth in the opinion of the court, which was delivered by

Wallin, J.

In this action, plaintiffs sue for the possession or value of certain personal property described in the complaint, and situated in the county of Cass, and claim a special property therein, by virtue of a certain chattel mortgage thereon executed in the state of Michigan. Defendant, by his answer, denies generally the allegations of the complaint, but admits that he is in possession of the property described in the complaint, and sets up ownership in himself, derived by a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mulcahy v. GlazierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Gull River Lumber Co. v. School District No. 39North Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  3. St. Paul & Sioux City Railroad v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1873
  4. Thomas v. TannerNew York Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Stocking v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Martinson v. MarzolfNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  2. McMahon v. PolkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  3. State ex rel. McClory v. DonovanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Treiber v. Citizens State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. CampbellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API