Re/Max International, Inc. v. Smythe, Cramer Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GWIN, District Judge.
On February 28, 2003, Defendant Smythe, Cramer Company (“Smythe, Cramer”) moved the Court to dismiss Plaintiff RE/MAX International, Inc.’s (“RE/MAX”) complaint against it. RE/ MAX’s complaint makes claims for breach of contract, tortious interference with prospective business relationships, defamation, and antitrust violations. RE/MAX also seeks declaratory relief.
Smythe, Cramer says that the Court should dismiss the entire complaint for failure to state a claim upon which the Court can grant relief. RE/MAX opposes the motion.
For the reasons that follow, the Court…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hawaii Medical Ass'n v. Hawaii Medical Service Ass'nHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- Days Inn Worldwide, Inc. v. Sai Baba, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Endless River Technologies LLC v. Trans Union LLC.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
- Yacko v. General Motors CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024