Legal Opinion

Re/Max International, Inc. v. Smythe, Cramer Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided May 20, 2003No. 1:03-cv-00040PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

GWIN, District Judge.

On February 28, 2003, Defendant Smythe, Cramer Company (“Smythe, Cramer”) moved the Court to dismiss Plaintiff RE/MAX International, Inc.’s (“RE/MAX”) complaint against it. RE/ MAX’s complaint makes claims for breach of contract, tortious interference with prospective business relationships, defamation, and antitrust violations. RE/MAX also seeks declaratory relief.

Smythe, Cramer says that the Court should dismiss the entire complaint for failure to state a claim upon which the Court can grant relief. RE/MAX opposes the motion.

For the reasons that follow, the Court…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hawaii Medical Ass'n v. Hawaii Medical Service Ass'nHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Days Inn Worldwide, Inc. v. Sai Baba, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
  3. Endless River Technologies LLC v. Trans Union LLC.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
  4. Yacko v. General Motors CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API