Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. O'Connor

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 1949No. Civ. 13879PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Appeal by plaintiff on the judgment roll alone from a judgment denying a divorce with prejudice, awarding to plaintiff and defendant jointly the custody of their two minor children, and requiring defendant to pay plaintiff $75 per month for the support of said children.

It is somewhat difficult to understand plaintiff’s position on this appeal. She does not contend that the evidence did not justify the court’s refusal to grant her a divorce, or that the court abused its discretion in granting joint custody of the children, nor does she attack the amount awarded for support of the minors or the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cardinale v. CardinaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Monroe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Ex parte GordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. McMullin v. McMullinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Booth v. BoothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Deyoe v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  2. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Solomon v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Jewett v. JewettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Deyoe v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API