Legal Opinion

Bannister v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 14, 1998No. 24869PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Justice:

We granted the State a writ of certiorari to review the post-conviction (PCR) judge’s grant of a new trial to respondent. We reverse.

FACTS

Respondent was indicted on charges of first degree burglary and assault with intent to commit first degree criminal sexual conduct (CSC). A jury convicted him of burglary but acquitted him of CSC.

At trial, the State produced evidence on May 30, 1993, respondent kicked open the front door and entered Unit F-16 of the Canebrake Apartments. Occupants in the apartment, all young teenagers, testified respondent stated he was looking for “Gayle”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. Butler v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ard v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. Porter v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. Charles Vandross v. Bryan StirlingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  5. Morris v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API