Legal Opinion

United States v. Ramon Velarde-Gomez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 23, 2001No. 99-50602PublishedCited by 138 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:

Ramon Velarde-Gomez (“Velarde”) appeals his conviction under 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960 for importation of marijuana, and under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. The government elicited testimony about Velarde’s post-arrest, pre-Mi-randa non-responses to questions during an interview by border agents, characterizing Velarde’s non-reaction as “demeanor” evidence. The district court allowed this *1026testimony over Velarde’s objection, agreeing in large measure with the government’s characterization and also finding a subsequent waiver…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by138 opinions

  1. State v. DeGraffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  2. United States v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Bruce Wayne Morris v. Eddie Ylst, Acting Warden for the California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. SalinasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  5. Robert E. Kennedy v. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API