Mattison v. Mattison
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Gage, J., Anderson, April, 1902. Action by Elip Mattison against Milton Mattison. From Circuit decree, defendant appeals. Mr. Tribble cites: 10 S. C., 354; 23 S. C., 232; 3 Hill, 194; 52 S. C., 245; 28 S. C., 238; 47 S. C., 288; 52 S. C., 554; 48 S. C., 440; 2 McC. Ch., 323; Bail. Eq., 383; 5 Reid S., 605; 2 Strob., 101; 5 Rich.
Read the full summary
Before Gage, J., Anderson, April, 1902. Action by Elip Mattison against Milton Mattison. From Circuit decree, defendant appeals. Mr. Tribble cites: 10 S. C., 354; 23 S. C., 232; 3 Hill, 194; 52 S. C., 245; 28 S. C., 238; 47 S. C., 288; 52 S. C., 554; 48 S. C., 440; 2 McC. Ch., 323; Bail. Eq., 383; 5 Reid S., 605; 2 Strob., 101; 5 Rich. Eq., 358; 17 S. C., 522; 57 S. C., 173; 56 S. C., 550. cite: 36 L. R. A., 186; 2 Jar. on Wills, 37; 16 S. C., 303; 1 Bay, 457; 1 Strob., 132; 1 Strob. Eq., 344; 1 Rich. Eq., 143; 3 Rich. Eq., 550; 10 S. C., 365; 16 S. C., 290; 28 S. C., 486; 27 S. C., 479; 23…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. ChiEE Justice Pope.
At the March term, 1902, at Anderson, S. C., a cause without action upon an agreed statement of facts was submitted to his Honor, Judge Gage, under sec. 374 of the Code of Procedure. The following was the agreed statement of facts: “On the 2d day of February, 1886, W. P. and N. C. Mattison executed a mortgage to H. I. Epting on the tract of land, containing eighty-six acres, more or less, situated in Anderson County, on waters of Saluda River, bounded by lands of Joel Kay, M. Smith, H. Austin and others. Mortgage was duly…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bethea v. BetheaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
- Simms v. BuistSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
- Miller v. GrahamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carolina Timber Co. v. HoldenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912