Legal Opinion

Maddox v. Katz

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1942No. 17559PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a redhibitory action in which the plaintiff, F. Alexander Maddox, sues Harry Katz, for the return of $60, the purchase price of a certain antique table, plus $20.25, the cost of repairs to the table, hauling and storage, as well as $25 for the loss of anticipated profit a total of $105.25. The claim for the profit on the table has since been abandoned.

Defendant filed several exceptions which were overruled or referred to the merits and, by way of answer, averred that he was in the business of selling new and second-hand furniture and other merchandise and that he sold "a certain…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  2. MacLehan v. Loft Candy Stores, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Standard Motor Co. v. St. AmantLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. United Motor Car Co. v. DrummLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Standard Motor Car Co. v. St. AmantLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Attorney General Ex Rel. Taylor v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  2. Sanders v. Sanders Tractor Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Juneau v. Bob McKinnon Chevrolet CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Roche v. BroussardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Max Barnett Furniture Co. v. KritikosLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API