Standard Motor Car Co. v. St. Amant
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLe Blanc, J.
We find the case to be properly stated in the original opinion heretofore handed down, and it is unnecessary to here restate it. 134 So. 279. We find also that we correctly stated what We construe the law to be with reference to the implied warranty that follows the sale of a secondhand automobile, and that in a suit of this nature the court may decree merely a .reduction of the price instead of an avoidance of the sale. We find, however, on further consideration, that we did not make a proper application of the law to the facts as we now view them, particularly with reference to lack of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Templeman Bros. Lumber Co. v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
- Standard Motor Co. v. St. AmantLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- First National Bank v. DimmickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
3Cited by9 opinions
- Guillory v. Morein Motor Company, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Ticheli v. SilmonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Anselmo v. Chrysler CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Roby Motors Co. v. HarrisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- Lokey v. Dixie Buick, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.