Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

The Baltimore Life Insurance Company v. Torres

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 22, 2021No. 1:21-cv-01001Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THE BALTIMORE LIFE INSURANCE Case No. 1:21-cv-01001-DAD-SAB COMPANY, 12 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiff, MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND AND 13 GRANTING MOTION TO SERVE BY v. PUBLICATION PURSUANT TO

28 U.S.C. § 14

1655 EMILY P. TORRES, et al., 15 ORDER VACATING NOVEMBER 24, 2021 Defendants. HEARING 16 (ECF No. 13) 17 18 I. 19 INTRODUCTION 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint to 21 add the unknown heirs, devisees, successors in interest, and claimants of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Christopher Owens Cynthia Hutchins,plaintiffs-Appellants v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan,inc., a California Corporation,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Amerisourcebergen Corporation v. Dialysist West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Hiram WebbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API