Legal Opinion
Cascadia Wildlands Project v. Goodman
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 20, 2004No. Civ.04-1424-HOPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order
HOGAN, District Judge.
The first amended complaint alleges violations of the National Environmental Poli cy Act and National Forest Management Act related to the Davis Fire Recovery Project. Plaintiffs move for an order enjoining the project pending resolution of the merits of their claims.
Background
The Davis Fire burned approximately 21,000 acres in an area roughly ten miles west of LaPine, Oregon during late June and early July, 2003. Davis Fire Recovery Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 1-2-3. Approximately 56% of the fire occurred within the Davis Late Suc-cessional Reserve…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. BlackwoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Arizona Cattle Growers' Ass'n v. United States Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Nutri-Cology, Inc., D/B/A Allergy Research Group Biocurrents, Inc. Stephen A. Levine Susan D. LevineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Lands Council v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Westlands Water District v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- LEAGUE OF WILDERNESS DEF. BLUE MOUNTAINS v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. GranthamDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. Medford District of the Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2005
- League of Wilderness Defenders Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010