Legal Opinion

Dracopoulas v. Pixley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 16, 1966No. 4504PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILSON, Justice.

Plaintiffs Bell and Rachal, licensed real estate brokers, sued Dracopoulas for real estate dealers’ commissions. After a jury verdict, judgment was rendered for plaintiffs against defendant Dracopoulas. We affirm.

Dracopoulas signed á 60-day exclusive listing contract to sell his property on March 17, 1962, by which he agreed to pay a commission. Dracopoulas refused to sign an extension of this agreement, but the jury found he orally extended the effective date before the term of the written agreement expired.

Dracopoulas urges that the oral extension of the term of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Robertson v. MeltonTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Garcia v. KaramTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Kistler v. LathamTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dracopoulas v. RachalTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Bates v. BatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API