Legal Opinion

Frame v. Nehls

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1995No. Docket 168015PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

Stephen Nehls (hereafter "appellant”) appeals as of right from the trial court’s order awarding summary disposition in favor of plaintiff and dismissing appellant’s petition for grandparent visitation rights with his grandson, Dustin. Appellant is the paternal grandfather of Dustin, who was born out of wedlock to plaintiff Gina E. Frame and defendant Jay J. Franklin Nehls. We reverse and remand.

Dustin was born in March of 1991. In May of 1993, defendant was adjudicated Dustin’s father, ordered to support him, and granted visitation.

After the trial court determined that Jay Nehls was Dustin’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark v. JeterSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Doe v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Department of Civil Rights Ex Rel. Forton v. Waterford Township Department of Parks & RecreationMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. El Souri v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Gerhardt v. Estate of MooreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Crego v. ColemanMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Frame v. NehlsMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Vargo v. SauerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. City of St Louis v. Michigan Underground Storage Tank Financial Assurance Policy BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Gilson v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API