Shumway v. Walworth & Neville Manufacturing Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay. (Cobb, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
Plaintiff sued for negligent injury. He was employed in defendant’s factory, and engaged in running a planer. George E. Neville, one of the officers of the corporation, had charge of defendant’s factory, and employed and discharged men. On the 28th of November, 1890, plaintiff had been interrupted in oiling his machine by the necessity of moving some timber which had been placed so near to his machine as to interfere with his work. He started the machine, and passed some of the timber through. It was discovered that the machine was out of order. The plaintiff threw it out of gear, took the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Slater v. ChapmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by7 opinions
- Beresford v. American Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Lohman v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Mikolojczak v. North American Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Cristanelli v. Saginaw Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. QuayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.