Calo v. Stuff
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 177 Ohio St.3d 63.] CALO, APPELLANT, v. STUFF, WARDEN,1 APPELLEE. [Cite as Calo v. Stuff,
2024-Ohio-5167.] Habeas corpus—A convicted inmate may not rely on former parole guidelines that were no longer effective by the time of the inmate’s parole hearing, even if those guidelines would have provided for earlier consideration of parole— A document is not considered filed in an Ohio court until deposited with the clerk of court—Inmate can prove no set of facts that would entitle him to immediate release from prison—Court of appeals’…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State ex rel. Seikbert v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Tyler v. AlexanderOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- City of Zanesville v. RouseOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- In re Disqualification of FuerstOhio Supreme Court · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State ex rel. Mora v. WatsonOhio Supreme Court · 2025
- State v. HallOhio Court of Appeals · 2026