Legal Opinion

VANGJELI v. BANKS

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 6, 2023No. 2:19-cv-01635Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SUZANA VANGJELI, : Plaintiff : CIVIL ACTION v. : LINWOOD BANKS, ef al, : No, 19-1635 Defendants : MEMORANDUM PRATTER, J. APR, 2023 Suzana Vangjeli asserts that she did not agree to the settlement agreement which Linwood Banks and Triple Canopy, Inc. now seek to enforce. For the reasons that follow, the Court concludes that there was no express authority for Ms. Vangjeli’s counsel to agree to the material terms of the settlement. BACKGROUND L Underlying Facts Suzana Vangjeli alleges various torts stemming from her…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Ahmed v. DragovichCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  4. Jermont Cox v. Martin HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  5. In Re John Rodgers BurnleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API