Legal Opinion

S. M. Hess & Bro. v. Small

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 20, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARVIN, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves for an order, under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice of the state of New York, granting summary judgment on the first cause of action set forth in the amended complaint. This rule reads as follows:

“Rule 113. Summary Judgment. When an answer is served in an action to recover a debt or liquidated demand arising ■ (1) on a contract, express or implied, sealed or not sealed; or (2) on a judgment for a stated sum, the answer may be struck out and judgment entered thereon on motion, and the affidavit of the plaintiff or of any other person having…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maslin v. Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1932
  2. Mayers v. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins.District Court, E.D. New York · 1935
  3. United States v. FiedlerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1930
  4. United States v. ScudderDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API