Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kestler v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1949No. 28,346Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Gilkison, J.

I concur fully with the dissenting opinion of Emmert, J., filed in this case.

The appellant was charged with, and convicted of murder in the first degree. Our statute so far as applicable to the charge in this case is as follows:

“Whoever purposely and with premeditated malice, . . . kills any human being, is guilty of murder in the first degree, . . .” Burns’ 1942 Replacement, § 10-3401.

I shall consider only whether there is any evidence in the record or any proper inference showing (1) that the killing was purposely done or (2) done with premeditated malice.

Of…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Western Commercial Travelers' Ass'n v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  3. Lincoln v. FrenchSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. LockeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Globe Accident Insurance v. GerischIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API