Legal Opinion
People v. Solimini
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 5, 2010PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*658Contrary to the defendant’s contention, there was a sufficient factual predicate in the record to support a jury instruction on consciousness of guilt (see People v Robinson, 10 AD3d 696 [2004]; People v Blasini, 253 AD2d 886 [1998]; People v London, 248 AD2d 554 [1998]; People v Shepherd, 176 AD2d 369 [1991]).
Further, the court, in giving its instruction, “conveyed the proper standard of law and did not confuse or mislead the jury” (People v London, 248 AD2d at 555). The court, inter alia, instructed the jury on the weight to be given to the evidence, properly left to the jury the question…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. ShepherdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. BlasiniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. LondonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. DennisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. BrambleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. ArriagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.