Legal Opinion · Dissent

Herbert v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 13, 1998No. 93-CV-407Published

1DissentTerry, Associate Judge

The principal issue in this case, one of first impression in this court, is whether the trial court was correct when it ruled that the District of Columbia could delegate to a contractor its duty to provide necessary and appropriate medical care to prisoners incarcerated in its prison system. I believe this ruling was erroneous, and thus I would reverse the judgment in favor of the District and remand this case for further proceedings.

In her motion for summary judgment, appellant argued that the District had a non-delegable duty to provide her with necessary medical care while she was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Logue v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API