Barham v. Hawk
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEER, Judge.
This appeal addresses the admissibility of expert testimony in a medical malpractice case. Plaintiff Gloria Barham appeals two rulings by the trial court, arguing that (1) the trial court erroneously admitted standard of care testimony by Dr. Danko Cerenko; and (2) the court improperly barred the expert testimony of Dr. Eric Kraus, who examined her husband’s ear following surgery by defendant Dr. Rodney J. Hawk.. We hold that the trial court erroneously allowed Dr. Cerenko to give testimony amounting to an opinion as to defendant Dr. Hawk’s compliance with the relevant standard of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. GroomsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- Gibbs v. Carolina Power & Light CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Coffman v. RobersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Brooks v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Smith v. WhitmerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Purvis v. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital Service Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Media Network, Inc. v. Long Haymes Carr, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Pitts v. Nash Day Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Musi v. Town of ShallotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Boykin v. KimCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.