Legal Opinion

Montesano Lumber Co. v. Portland Iron Works

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1915PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From Multnomah.: George N. Davis, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice McBride. This is an action by the Montesano Lumber Company, a corporation, against the Portland Iron Works, a corporation, for damages begun in the Circuit Court of Multnomah County upon a complaint, the material portions of which, after setting up the fact that the plaintiff is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Washington, and that defendant is an Oregon corporation, may be stated as…

Read the full summary

From Multnomah.: George N. Davis, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice McBride. This is an action by the Montesano Lumber Company, a corporation, against the Portland Iron Works, a corporation, for damages begun in the Circuit Court of Multnomah County upon a complaint, the material portions of which, after setting up the fact that the plaintiff is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Washington, and that defendant is an Oregon corporation, may be stated as follows: ‘‘That at all of the times herein mentioned the said plaintiff has been and it now is the owner of a certain…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McBride

1, 2. Many specifications of error are assigned in the abstract, but only three are specified or discussed in the brief or at the hearing, and we shall therefore treat the others as waived. It is admitted that the laws of the State of Washington require that articles of incorporation shall specify the name of the city, town or locality in which the principal place of business of the company is to be located, and it is shown that the articles of the defendant’s vendee so specified Seattle, in King County. It also appears that the Supreme Court of Washington has decided that the residence of a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Stone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Embury v. . ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  4. Cotton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  5. Livingston v. JeffersonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Virginia · 1811

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. MacK Trucks, Inc. v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Salitan v. DashneyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. In Re Stoddard's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Montesano Lum. & Mfg. Co. v. Portland Iron WorksOregon Supreme Court · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API