Yniguez v. Arizonans for Official English
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
These consolidated appeals require us to consider an important area, of constitutional law, rarely reexamined since a series of cases in the 1920s in which the Supreme Court struck down laws restricting the use of non-English languages. See Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 43 S.Ct. 625, 67 L.Ed. 1042 (1923); Bartels v. Iowa, 262 U.S. 404, 43 S.Ct. 628, 67 L.Ed. 1047 (1923); Yu Cong Eng v. Trinidad, 271 U.S. 500, 46 S.Ct. 619, 70 L.Ed. 1059 (1926); Farrington v. Tokushige, 273 U.S. 284, 47 S.Ct. 406, 71 L.Ed. 646 (1927). Here, once again, the state has chosen to use…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Spencer Tunick v. Howard Safir, in His Official Capacity as the Police Commissioner of the City of New York, and the City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Ruiz v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Yniguez v. Arizonans for Official EnglishCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Bland v. FesslerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Berkeley Community Health Project v. City of BerkeleyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.