Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1914PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Logan County. Action by Elvessia P. Atkinson and others against the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, Judge:

■ Damages in the sum of five hundred dollars having been awarded plaintiffs against defendant, the latter complains of error.

The ground of action is the diversion of water from its natural course to the injury of plaintiff’s land. There is evidence from which the jury were warranted' in finding that defendant negligently maintained an insufficient and im*634properly constructed culvert for the passage of water in its natural course under a railroad fill, and that the maintenance of-such a culvert caused the water .to become dammed up and to flow out of its course over plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McGraw v. B. & O. R. R. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Neal v. Ohio River R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hecht v. Boston Wharf Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  2. Riddle v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. McCausland v. JarrellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Adkins v. City of HintonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. In Re Flood LitigationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API