Legal Opinion
Newhouse v. McCormick & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 5, 1997No. Nos. 96-1456, 96-1535PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
Both parties to these appeals have filed motions for an award of attorneys’ fees. Ap-pellee/Cross-Appellant Newhouse seeks fees as the prevailing party in the main appeal (No. 96-1456), and Appellant/Cross-Appellee McCormick and Co., Inc. (McCormick) seeks fees for successfully defending against and thereby becoming the prevailing party with respect to Newhouse’s separate appeal (No. 96-1535) which we consolidated as a cross-appeal.
While Newhouse was the prevailing party in the main appeal in this age discrimination ease, his victory was less than…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Indianapolis Colts v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Taylor v. Sentry Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Reid v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Patrick A. Dadd v. Anoka CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Misischia v. St. John's Mercy Health SystemsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Richard Newhouse v. McCormick & Co., Inc., United States of America, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- U.S. Water Services, Inc. v. ChemTreat, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- 75 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 648, 74 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,602 Richard Newhouse, Cross-Appellant/appellee v. McCormick & Co., Inc., Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.