Legal Opinion

Kaminsky v. Kaminsky

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 27, 1961No. 18918PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

The parties appear here in the same order as in the trial court, and we refer to the plaintiff in error as the wife and to defendant in error as the husband.

An amended complaint was filed by the wife which set forth two claims. In the first she sought a divorce and other relief customary to a divorce action. In the second claim she asked for past and future support money, an accounting of property, creation of a trust, and other relief.

Error is assigned to the granting of the husband’s motions for (1) summary judgment as to the first claim on the ground of res judicata based on a decree of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Parrish v. De RemerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  2. Meldrum v. MeldrumSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  3. Jewel v. JewelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  4. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. HammerDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1949
  5. Mellen v. HirschDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. MusimSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  2. DeCosta Sporting Goods, Inc. v. KirklandNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Harrod v. HarrodColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Brennan v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  5. Kalevik v. KalevikColorado Court of Appeals · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API