Legal Opinion

STMicroelectronics, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided March 17, 2004No. 4:03-cv-00276PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAVIS, District Judge.

Before the Court is STMicroelectronics, N.V. and STMicroelectronics, Inc.’s Motion to Enforce Motorola Inc.’s Compliance with Patent Rule 3-1, and Brief in Support Thereof (Docket No. 37). STMicroelec-tronics, N.V. and STMicroelectronics, Inc. (collectively “STM”) contend that Motorola Ine.’s (“Motorola”) preliminary infringement contentions fail to comply with Patent Rule 3-1 because they “(1) do not show how each of the elements of Motorola’s claims compare to specific [STM] products and (2) do not identify specifically by name either the allegedly infringing…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Keranos, LLC v. Silicon Storage Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  2. CONNECTEL, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2005
  3. American Video Graphics, L.P. v. Electronic Arts, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2005
  4. Honeywell International, Inc. v. Acer America CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2009
  5. Linex Technologies, Inc. v. Belkin International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API