Legal Opinion
Honeywell International, Inc. v. Acer America Corporation
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided February 5, 2009No. 4:07-cv-00125PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN D. LOVE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff Honeywell International, Inc.’s and Honeywell Intellectual Properties, Inc.’s (collectively “Honeywell”) Motion to Compel Discovery from Defendant CPT, (Doc. No. 127), and Reply in Support, (Doc. No. 133), and Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes’ (“CPT”) Response (Doc. No. 129), and Sur-reply, (Doc. No. 134). The Court held a hearing on this Motion on January 29, 2009.
For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiffs Motion is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
In this suit, Honeywell asserts that CPT’s products…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. DisimoneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Dsu Medical Corporation v. Jms Co., LtdCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Microsoft Corp. v. At&t Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- C.R. Bard, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Invensas Corp. v. Renesas Electronics Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Avago Technologies U.S., Inc. v. Iptronics Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Epos Technologies Ltd v. Pegasus Technologies Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- ATX NETWORKS (TORONTO) CORP. v. TECHNETIX, INC.District Court, D. Colorado · 2026
- Kirsch Research and Development, LLC v. BlueLinx CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.