WARM SPRINGS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY v. WJ McAULAY
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Gunderson, J.:
Warm Springs Development Company here appeals from a judgment declaring the express terms of a mineral lease enforceable, urging that an implied covenant should be read into the lease, to contradict its explicit provisions. We disagree.
On November 18, 1962, Henry Houck entered into a heat, fluid, and mineral lease with respondent, W. J. McAulay, for 80 acres in Humboldt County. The lease was for twenty years (until November 18, 1982), but provided for termination if McAulay failed either to drill a well by October 18, 1963, or to pay nominal rents to defer…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Monarch Oil, Gas & Coal Co. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- Consumers Gas Trust Co. v. LittlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Coats v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Central States Production Corp. v. JordanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.