Legal Opinion
Boesky v. Siegel
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 29, 2018No. Case No. 17–cv–12119PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MARK A. GOLDSMITH, United States District Judge
This matter is before the Court on Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction (Dkt. 8) and Plaintiff's motion for leave to file first amended complaint (Dkt. 14). The issues were fully briefed, and hearings were held on November 7, 2017 and February 15, 2018. For the reasons that follow, the Court grants Plaintiff's motion and denies, as moot, Defendant's motion.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Marilynn Boesky is a resident of California, and the owner of a membership interest in Pearlman LLC. Compl. ¶¶ 1, 3 (Dkt. 1). Defendant…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Directv, Inc. And Echostar Satellite L.L.C. v. Mark Treesh, Commissioner for the Department of Revenue for the State of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fitch v. American Electric Power System Comprehensive Medical PlanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021