Legal Opinion

Dodson v. Crocker

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1906PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, ■ Minnehaha ^County. Hon. J. W. JonRS, Judge. Action by Emery F. Dodson, as surviving partner of F. A. Fisher & Co., against Charles T. Crocker. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHaney, J.

Adhering to the views heretofore expressed, the issues in this action will be restated only so far as necessary to determine a question of practice not alluded to in our former decision. Dodson v. Crocker, 16 S. D. 481, 94 N. W. 391. The complaint set forth a written contract between the plaintiff and one E. J. Torre}'-, wherein the latter agreed to purchase a certain mechanic’s lien claim, provided he should find upon investigation that such lien was “a first claim” upon the property against which it was filed. It alleges that the lien was “a first claim against the property,” that Torry was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Breuner v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Dodson v. CrockerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Van Loh v. ProsserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Fischer v. GormanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Hines v. MoultonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Johnson v. Petroleum Carriers, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State ex rel. Parsons v. KaufmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API