Cahill v. Verdier
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The plaintiffs commenced an action against the defendant for the reasonable value of labor and materials furnished the defendant at his special instance and request. The plaintiffs recovered a judgment in the trial court, and the defendant has appealed under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The defendant complains because the trial was had in the absence of the defendant and of defendant’s counsel. In this behalf it becomes pertinent to note that on Febru ary 9, 1921, the plaintiffs’ attorney served and filed a notice of motion to set the case for trial. In that notice it was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vrooman v. Li Po TaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Sheldon v. LandwehrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Modoc Land & Livestock Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Estate of WempeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- In Re Estate of DeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bird v. McGuireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Elliano v. Assurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Tubby v. TubbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. BusickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Simon v. TomasiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.