In re Pitts
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON CREDITOR’S MOTION TO REOPEN CASE TO ENFORCE REAFFIRMATION AGREEMENT
MICHAEL G. WILLIAMSON, Bankruptcy Judge.
In order for a reaffirmation agreement to be binding upon an individual debtor who is not represented by an attorney while negotiating the agreement, the court must hold a hearing at which the debtor appears in person and at which the court informs the debtor of the voluntary nature of the agreement and the legal consequences of entering into it. Even though most courts have long since dispensed with discharge hearings, and hearings are not required to approve…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- In Re BowlingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Indiana · 1990
- In Re PendleburyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1988
- In Re HovestadtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re PerlmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2012
- In re McHaleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2018