Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 12, 1957PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHyman Korn, J.

This is a motion made by the defendant to vacate a warrant of attachment or, in the alternative, reduce the amount thereof and increase plaintiff’s bond. It is well to recite the facts in the case.

Plaintiff, a resident of the State of New Jersey, a truck driver, allegedly was injured by a falling clock in one of the defendant’s stores on December 14, 1955. An action for personal injuries was commenced by the service of a summons and complaint on June 20,1957 which was answered by the defendant on June 28, 1957 together with a request for a bill of particulars. The plaintiff served the bill of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Penoyar v. . KelseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Haebler v. . BernharthNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Reich v. SpiegelNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Rowles v. HoareNew York Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dafeng Hengwei Textile Co. v. Aceco Industrial & Commercial Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  2. Thornock v. Kinderhill Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  3. Nippon Emo-Trans Co., Ltd. v. Emo-Trans, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1990
  4. Trigo Hnos., Inc. v. Premium Wholesale Groceries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  5. Incontrade, Inc. v. Oilborn International, S. A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API