Legal Opinion
Morris v. International Agricultural Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 18, 1936No. 25038, 25039PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.
1. There being a conflict between the record and the recitals in the bill of exceptions, the record controls. Sanders v. State, 18 Ga. App. 786 (90 S. E. 728).
2. A set-off is a cross-action, and must be pleaded with as much certainty and definiteness as a declaration in any suit of law. Kahrs v. Kahrs, 115 Ga. 288 (3) (41 S. E. 649) ; Bracken v. Dillon, 64 Ga. 243 (6) (37 Am. R. 70) ; Atlanta Glass Co. v. Noizet, 88 Ga. 43, 44 (13 S. E. 833) ; Code, §§ 81-101, 24-3310, 81-105.
3. The amendment offered at the time of the trial of 'the case was in the following language: “Row comes the defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McRitchie v. Atlanta Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Bracken & Ellsworth v. Dillon & SonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- Longley v. Bank of ParrottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Third National Bank v. PoeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Atlanta Glass Co. v. NoizetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City Stores Company v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Herron v. Interstate Life & Accident Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Rowland v. Rich's, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Smith v. MonroeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Carroll v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.