Legal Opinion
Rowland v. Rich's, Inc.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided September 7, 1956No. 19412PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
“It is well settled that a general allegation of fraud, in a bill, amounts to nothing — it is necessary that the complainant show, by specifications, wherein the fraud consists. Issuable facts must be charged. The demurrer confesses only what is well pleaded.” Carter v. Anderson, 4 Ga. 516, 519; Tolbert v. Caledonian Ins. Co., 101 Ga. 741, 746 (28 S. E. 991); Miller v. Butler, 121 Ga. 758 (3) (49 S. E. 754); Anderson v. Goodivin, 125 Ga. 663, 669 (54 S. E. 679); Jones v. Robinson, 172 Ga. 746, 747 (3c) (158 S. E. 752); Robertson v. Panlos, 208 Ga. 116, 118 (65 S. E. 2d 400).
In…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jones v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Anderson v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Robertson v. PanlosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Carter v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
- Swofford v. GlazeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Regenstein v. J. Regenstein Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Sorrells v. Atlanta Transit System, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Chambliss v. KindredSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Welch v. WelchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Colonial Manor Motel, Inc. v. Crossroads Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.