Quinn v. State

The indictment charges that “ The defendant unlawfully sold to one William M. Hankins, at and for the price of twenty-five cents, one-half pint of intoxicating liquor, the same being a less quantity than a quart; the said Malachy Quinn not being then and there licensed according to law to sell intoxicating liquor in less quantity than a quart at a time.”

The argument that the indictment is bad because, as counsel say, it does not show that the appellant sold a less quantity of intoxicating liquor than a quart, is entirely destitute of strength. Mullen v. State, 96 Ind. 304; Walter v. State,…