Legal Opinion

Camarena v. Sears Contract, Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Decided April 26, 2007No. I.C. NO. 243303Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award, based upon the record of the proceedings before the Deputy Commissioner and the briefs and argument before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award, except for modifications.

The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner and in a Pre-Trial Agreement as:

STIPULATIONS

1…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gupton v. Builders TransportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Whitley v. Columbia Lumber Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Dishmond v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API