Legal Opinion
Eolas Technologies Inc. v. Adobe Systems, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided July 19, 2012No. Case No. 6:09-CV-446PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON BILL OF COSTS
LEONARD DAVIS, District Judge.
Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Memorandum Regarding Defendants’ Bills of Costs [Agreed and Disputed] (Docket No. 1404). Eolas Technologies Incorporated and The Regents of the University of California (collectively “Eolas”) object to several of Defendants’ proposed costs.
APPLICABLE LAW
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d), costs are to be awarded to the prevailing party as a matter of course, unless the court directs otherwise. However, the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1920 limit a court’s discretion in taxing costs against…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mota v. University of Texas Houston Health Science CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Race Tires America, Inc. v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Gaddis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- S & D Trading Academy, LLC v. AAFIS Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
3Cited by22 opinions
- Luther Stanley v. Cottrell Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Allstate Insurance v. PlambeckDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2014
- Finnerty v. Stiefel Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
- Aircraft Holding Solutions LLC v. Learjet IncDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022
- Alorica Inc. v. Tech Mahindra (Americas) Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2026
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.