Legal Opinion

Bogle v. Armenakis

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 16, 2002No. 97C-10766; A114605PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

The issue in this appeal is whether the post-conviction court’s disposition of petitioner’s case was within the scope of our remand instructions in Bogle v. Armenakis, 172 Or App 55, 18 P3d 390 (2001) (Bogle I), or was beyond the post-conviction court’s jurisdiction. We review for errors of law, conclude that the post-conviction court acted within its authority and jurisdiction, and affirm.

Petitioner was convicted after a jury trial of one count of first-degree burglary, two counts of first-degree robbery, four counts of first-degree kidnapping, two counts of second-degree assault, and one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. O'Leary v. JacobsOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Bogle v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. Brock v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PervishCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Allen v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. BisbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API