Legal Opinion
United States v. Foreman
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 16, 2009No. 09-1345PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.
In September 2008, a jury found Patricia Foreman guilty of one count of social security benefits fraud, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1383a(a)(3), and three counts of theft of government money, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. On appeal, Foreman seeks a new trial, arguing that the district court 1 committed reversible error by admitting two documents as business records under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6) and that the Government engaged in prosecutorial misconduct by asking her improper questions on cross-examination. For the following reasons, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
In…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Whorton v. BocktingSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Ben J. MullinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Richard Alan TulkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Jonathan WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. MashekCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Mohammed Sharif AlaboudiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.