Legal Opinion
Hilkovsky v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 23, 1974No. 854-71; No. 856-71; No. 857-71PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNici-iols, Judge
On December 3, 1971, plaintiffs holding various interests in six tracts of land within the outer boundaries of the Point Beyes National Seashore in Marin County, California, north of San Francisco, filed suits alleging taking of these lands by the United 'States. Such suits are said to be for “inverse *463condemnation” as they differ from ordinary land condemnations wherein the Government is the plaintiff. Jurisdiction is based upon the Fifth Amendment just compensation clause and 28 U.S.C. § 1491. On appropriate motions the six cases were consolidated on August 17,1972, and heard together by the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Drakes Bay Land Company, a Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Fallini v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Don King Productions, Inc. v. DouglasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Fallini v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Kabua v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.