Legal Opinion

Medina Cty. Bar Assn. v. Grieselhuber

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1997No. 1996-2783PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 78 Ohio St.3d 373.] MEDINA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION V. GRIESELHUBER. [Cite as Medina Cty. Bar Assn. v. Grieselhuber,

1997-Ohio-58.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Public reprimand—Violating Disciplinary Rules relating to attorney advertising. (No. 96-2783—Submitted February 19, 1997—Decided May 14, 1997.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 95-52. __________________ {¶ 1} On June 5, 1995, relator, Medina County Bar Association, filed a complaint against respondent,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Friedman v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Medina County Bar Ass'n v. GrieselhuberOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. FurthOhio Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API