Malcolm v. Bath Iron Works Corp.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
GODFREY, Justice.
Warren Malcolm appeals from a pro for-ma decree dismissing his petition for workers’ compensation. The commissioner dismissed the petition on the ground that Malcolm did not notify his employer, Bath Iron Works (BIW), that he had been injured within thirty days of the injury as required by 39 M.R.S.A. § 63 (1978). 1 We deny the appeal.
The commissioner made only the following findings in his decision:
It is found that there was no notice given in this case in accordance with pro visions of the Maine Workers’ Compensation Act.
It is specifically found that Warren E. Malcolm and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pino v. Maplewood Packing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- Williams v. International Lubricant Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Girlish v. Acme Precision Products, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hird v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- Upham v. Van Baalen Pacific Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Jensen v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009