O'Brien Gear & Machine Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Per curiam
This case comes before the court on plaintiffs exceptions to the recommended decision of Trial Judge David Schwartz, filed August 16, 1977, pursuant to Rule 134(h), having been submitted to the court on the briefs and oral argument of counsel. Upon consideration thereof, since the court agrees with the trial judge’s recommended decision, as hereinafter set forth,* it hereby affirms and adopts the said decision as the basis for its judgment in this case. Accordingly, the court concludes and specifically finds that defendant’s special plea in fraud is sustained and plaintiffs claim is adjudged…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Neifert-White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rainwater v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Sterling Millwrights, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Tyger Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- McCarthy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.